Yes, and most historians (including non-Christians, Jews, agnostics, etc.) believe that Jesus existed and was crucified. (though they don't all believe in the miracles etc.).
most is not all, and popularity is not a basis for producing facts... a million believers in a lie do not make it a fact.
Numerous, diverse historical evidence supports that Jesus was not a myth.
Numerous diverse historical references show that people heard of the Jesus story, which has absolutely nothing to do with it being based on a real person or a myth, numerous persons in modern times have heard the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and there you have it? real? apparently not. or what about golden plates of the book of mormon, numerous historical references show that people have heard of them...but do you believe they really existed? I dont.
Paul and other ealry Christians taught that Jesus was a real person crucified under Pilate, who lived during the time of and interacted with other historical persons (ie: John the Baptist, Caiphas, etc.).
what do you have beyond written legends, rumors and myths to support this ascersion?
Furthermore Paul believed in a historcal Jesus before his vision (He persectued the already existing Church before his vision). The apostles spent years with Jesus before the resurrection, and there were apostles before Paul.
Paul was persecuting the followers of THE WAY, which may have existed for a hundred or more years prior to this time period and have nothing to do with a real Jesus as the dead sea scrolls show... the teacher of righteousness was a myth already a 100 years old by the time of Paul.. the name Jesus or yah-shua[YAH-DELIVERS/SAVES] is like many fictious names given to story book characters because of their role in the story.
There were apostles and followers of Jesus before Paul (so the idea that Paul was the initaiator of Christianity is false).
as to the 12 apostles, if they were real people why do we have such an odd history where Paul seems to be next to peter, the only real preachers of the gospel, what happened to the other 11 [counting Mathias replacing Judas]... it seems they never really existed in history at all other than vague later church legends of their accomplishments.
bottom line, I was a JW for 10+ years and accepted many of these MYTHS as fact only because I had never been shown there was any alternative views, when I left and started exploring what others like humanists, atheists and agnostics were saying about the bible, I was shocked. I had no idea about the parallels of a dozen older divine born godmen who made disciples and taught the mysteries and then rose from the dead after being brutally murdered... or that buddhist had schools in egypt in the first cent. and a half dozen or so of Jesus parables are nearly word for word translations.
my understanding of what is real and what is not real is not very clear as it is, but it is certainly a lot more believeable to see the Jesus story as another in a long line of merchant trade route myth making, of which the Masons to today seem to be the most accurate and direct descendants...then to believe in the irrational beliefs of christianity having any resemblance to reality.
we all agree Jesus is a character in a story, but unless there is some hard evidence showing he was more, I am quite content to accept that he never existed as more than a fable.